Is management by objectives good or bad?

The MBO has enabled countless organizations to achieve and, in many cases, exceed their objectives since the mid-1950s. The common result of management by objectives is increased productivity, teamwork and communication.

Is management by objectives good or bad?

The MBO has enabled countless organizations to achieve and, in many cases, exceed their objectives since the mid-1950s. The common result of management by objectives is increased productivity, teamwork and communication. One of the main weaknesses often observed in the MBO is the poor planning of the program before its implementation. They must know how to involve all levels of management and get their support.

The MBO is largely useful for management and professional employees. It is not suitable for all levels and for everyone due to the high demands it entails. It can only become applicable when both subordinates and managers are comfortable with it and are willing to participate in it. Money management for single parents who go alone.

If there were none, then both managers and their superiors could have made a faster and more comfortable decision about separation. Many organizations are making this problem worse by promising young people that they will have challenges because they assume that these employees will face management objectives. This runs counter to the opportunity for colleagues, both from the same work unit and from complementary units, to develop objectives together to achieve maximum integration. Simplified supervision: facilitates self-evaluation and feedback, which improves managers' efficiency.

Clear, specific objectives and unbiased feedback on performance contribute to increased job satisfaction compared to a situation in which a person does not know what is expected of them and how their performance will be judged, if at all. Usually, each reporting manager's range of options is limited to one option for a part of the organization or the improvement of specific statistics. Managers are starting to worry because now, when they ask why something hasn't been done, they hear each other: “Those aren't among my goals. This means, of course, that managers should always ensure that current objectives, like any other short-term plan, are designed to meet long-term goals.

In other words, the relevance of the objectives must be constantly checked and verified, especially in a changing environment. The MBO helps the individual manager to develop personal leadership and skills useful for the efficient management of the activities of a business unit. This is reflected in all the decisions that each manager makes and improves the overall performance of the organization. The clarity of the functions and objectives ensures, on the one hand, that the organization's scarce resources are not wasted and, on the other, the determined dedication to achieving the objectives.

Results-oriented management: Management focuses managers' attention on the results that need to be achieved rather than on the activities. Therefore, the higher a person rises in an organization and the more varied and subtle the work, the more difficult it is to set objectives that represent more than a fraction of their effort. If asked, each manager can name a younger employee as a possible successor, especially if the promotion depends on it; but no one has the time, nor is he paid, to train the young person thoroughly. Top management often assumes that it is the only one that has the prerogative

to

a) set the objectives,



b) provide the rewards and goals, and



c) promote anyone who works for the organization.

Doug Pelletiu
Doug Pelletiu

Total bacon ninja. Avid travel scholar. Evil bacon advocate. Freelance social media scholar. Devoted beer practitioner. Incurable bacon guru.

Leave a Comment

All fileds with * are required